A taxonomy of privacy
I was recently at an ISACA breakfast where the guest speaker, Robert Garigue, CSO of BMO Group, surprised me by peppering his security presentation with "soft", unquantifiable concepts such as semiotics, ontologies, taxonomies, knowledge, and meaning throughout his presentation to the assembled group of audit and control professionals. Perhaps my seemingly unrelated interests in religion, library and information science, and information security are related after all? With this thought echoing in my mind, I was interested to see Bruce Schneier's post referencing Daniel Solove's legal paper on the taxonomy of privacy.
inside the man
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Blog Archive
-
▼
2005
(228)
-
▼
April
(40)
- Lessig on librariesLawrence Lessig gave the keynot...
- Today's public service announcementThe caribou (Qu...
- Alberta privacy commissioner rebukes Edmonton poli...
- Infosec: Can you be too paranoid? Interesting col...
- Today's public service announcementThe American bl...
- Cho U wins LG CupCho U (9p) of Japan defeated Yu B...
- British report expected to support the use of OSS ...
- Hubble celebrates 15th anniversaryBreathtaking new...
- Today's public service announcementThe racoon (Qui...
- Hushmail hit by DNS attackThe register reports tha...
- Today's public service announcementThe canvasback ...
- Canadian file swapping appeal panel adjourns The ...
- Today's public service announcementThe woodchuck (...
- Melville's Billy Budd and SecurityIt seems to be a...
- Today's public service announcementThe killdeer (Q...
- A taxonomy of privacy I was recently at an ISACA ...
- Today's public service announcementThe snowy owl (...
- Infallibility, doctrinal change, and the Catholic ...
- Online goTwo separate international Internet go ch...
- Today's public service announcementThe ptarmigan (...
- Slashdot coverage of the US elite hacker squadAn i...
- Today's public service announcementThe black bear ...
- Vatican on lookout for eavesdroppers The latest o...
- Today's public service announcementThe Canadian be...
- The US Patriot Act drives Canadian privacy reform ...
- Security meets religion: hacking the papal electio...
- Baseball and ritual violence in American culture ...
- File sharing not responsible for music sales decli...
- 1527 journals on the DOAJ The Directory of Open A...
- Revisions to the Patriot Act in the worksThis arti...
- Canadian government outsourcing and the Patriot Ac...
- Chinese repression of Uighur Muslims A recent Hum...
- The 18th Fujitsu Cup is well underwayFollowing two...
- Digital Copyright Canada This great website advoc...
- Chinese People's Daily critiques US protectionism ...
- Chinese People's Daily critiques US protectionism ...
- Japanese privacy legislation goes into force Japa...
- Bengali writer sued for defiling idol Sunil Gango...
- Battle obesity with a video game! DDR (aka Dance ...
- Rabbi backs India's 'lost Jews' The BBC reports t...
-
▼
April
(40)
About Me
- thrashor
- Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
- Returned to working as a Management Consultant, specializing in risk, security, and regulatory compliance, with Fujitsu Canada after running the IT shop in the largest library in the South Pacific.
2 comments:
Mabye they are not so "soft" anymore as they get operationalized in XML and OWL...In fact, they become actionable. True, they are still limited in many respects but then any thing that is able evolve into higher levels of abstraction also enables higher levels of controls and possibilities.
Garigue also referenced the inexorable evolution of information from the simple to the complex. A similar continuous process could be pointed out with respect to the evolution of human knowledge - at least in the western world - which strives to make the implicit explicit. In this light, OWL has emerged to make the implicit or only partially explicit relationships between ideas fully explicit. The question is, does OWL do a good job at this? Certainly, it provides a degree of machine readability that was not previously available, but can the relationships between ideas really be accurately expressed by such a limited set of links?
Post a Comment